No won/winning lots to show

Won Lots

Hammer Price

Buyer's Premium

ARR

Import Duty

VAT on Hammer

Total

Upcoming Lots

Maximum Bid

Buyer's Premium

ARR

Import Duty

VAT on Hammer

Total

Winning Bidder

You have won this lot

You have been outbid

You did not win this lot

Under Reserve

Starting Bid:

Current Bid:

My Maximum Bid:

Time Remaining:

Next minimum bid:

This lot has been re-opened for bidding

Please note that by submitting a bid you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions

You are the highest bidder

You currently have the highest bid with your maximum bid of £0,000. If the auction was ending now, you would win this lot at £0,000.

You are the winning bidder

You have secured this lot at a price of £0,000. We're currently processing the auction and will send you an email with further instructions in a few minutes.

You have been outbid

Another bidder has entered a higher maximum bid and you have been outbid. Please add a new maximum bid to be in with a chance of winning.

We're sorry you did not win this lot

Lot sold for £0,000, Your bid was £0,000.

Under Reserve

Your bid is under reserve.

Description

Lock picking trial.- Calumny Exposed. Parnell & Puckridge versus John Goater, Foreman to Chubb & Son, ink and perforated library stamps, full-page advertisement for 'Defiance and National Locks' to inner rear wrapper, spine taped, housed in later limp card, 8vo, Parnell & Puckridge, 52 Strand, 1855.

⁂ An account of Parnell & Puckridge's appeal to the High Court following what they believed was the unfair picking of one of their 'Defiance Locks' by the foreman of their rivals Chubb & Son. While on exhibition at the Crystal Palace Parnell & Puckridge had offered two hundred guineas to anyone who could 'fairly' pick their lock. Goater managed to achieve this, but out of the opening hours of the exhibition and with no member of the plaintiff's firm present. Moreover, the cover plate of the lock was not fitted as normal. Accordingly, they refused to pay the reward and were now seeking damages from the court. The jury found in their favour and were awarded £30, plus £200 in damages and costs.

Condition

Please Login or Register to request further information and images

Loading...

Auction Paused

This Lot has ended

Congratulations, you have won this lot

We're sorry you did not win this lot

Your bid was under reserve.

Estimate: -

Final bid:

Go to current lot

You will be automatically redirected to current lot in:

Estimate: -

Current bid:

You are placing a maximum bid for

This lot has now entered the BidUp phase, please close this overlay and use the BidUp functions to increase your bid.

Loading... Time Remaining

BP (Inc. VAT):

All Charges:

Your maximum bid is out of increment and will be rounded down to when placed.

Please note that submitting this bid is legally binding and in accordance with our Terms and Conditions.

Terms and Conditions

All bidders accept full liability for bids submitted.

Please note that by submitting a bid you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions.

Newsletter Signup

Keyword Alerts

NewsletterNewsletter